Sunday, 9 November 2014
On 05:09 by Unknown No comments
Baraza linawaomba wananchi kutokuamini huduma hizo ikiwamo za matumizi ya mashine za Quantim na zile za kuondoa sumu mwilini, pamoja na kuwataka waganga wanaotoa tiba hizo kujisajili ili kufanya kazi zao kihalali.
Hayo yamezungumzwa na Mwenyekiti wa Baraza la Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala, Profesa Rogassian Mahunnah alipokuwa akizungmza na wanahabari katika Ukumbi wa Habari Maelezo jijini Dar es Salaam.
Kujua mengi zaidi tembela www.atmetz.blogspot.com
Sunday, 2 November 2014
On 01:59 by Unknown No comments
Friday, 31 October 2014
On 02:08 by Unknown No comments
Dubai is one of the emirates that form
the UAE (United Arab Emirates). Perhaps the most famous of the seven
regions, and all because of two words; eccentricity and luxury. In less
than thirty years, Dubai went from being the centenary fishing village
to become one of the most distinctive and well-known cities of the
planet.
In this collection of images we visit
the famous city to understand how is Dubai, luxury and rich eccentrics.
Clearly not everyone in the emirate are so rich than the persons you can
see bellow, however, the images you see below are reason enough. I hope you will enjoy seeing these images.
Dubai was built in the desert, hence the palm trees…
Course, are somewhat larger than normal. Even enters a luxury hotel on them…
While that’s nothing in a place where everyone enters the world…
the whole world? Sounds a bit overwhelming. Would be better if I go to a mall or a drink…
Or the biggest garden of the world that only has 45 million flowers larger flowers… That’s it?
Maybe a coffee or a tea …
But first I will have to withdraw money from a vending machine for gold. Of course…
People of Dubai love gold, they have cars, shops … including dental prostheses made of gold and diamonds. 24 carat gold and 156 small diamonds worth $ 153,000
In the end I decided to get a coffee, but I’ll have to rent a car; the place is extensive… and high
Now what I decide? Do I ask the car to the authorities?
Or do I step through the parking lot of the American University in Dubai to see if it takes me a student?
I think it is best to go a with a sheikh…
Well… maybe that’s a little dangerous. I didn’t know they love to go with their pets…
I’d better grab one of these abandoned cars … yeah, that’s what I’ll do
But it is very late… I’d better look for a hotel…
So I can rest and lay off the day watching the biggest fireworks display that was ever made in the world. This is how Dubai greeted 2014 …
Tuesday, 28 October 2014
On 08:15 by Unknown No comments
Tiba Asili itakavyotangazwa kimataifa
NA MWANDISHI WETU, Dar
KUANZIA Novemba 16 hadi 23 mwaka huu, kutakuwa na
tukio la kihistoria katika Viwanja vya Mnazi mmoja jijini Dar es Salaam.
Kutafanyika Maonyesho ya Bias
hara ya Kimataifa ya Tiba Asili ya Mwafrika.
Maonyesho haya yanafanyika nchini kwa mara ya kwanza
na yameandaliwa na Jukwaa la Tiba Asili Tanzania kushirikiana na Wizara ya Afya
na Ustawi wa Jamii na Mamlaka ya Maendeleo ya Biashara Tanzania (TANTRADE).
Wadau mbalimbali wa Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala kutoka
nje na ndani ya Bara la Afrika wanatarajiwa kushiriki katika maonyesho hayo ambayo kauli
mbiu yake ni ‘Ushirikiano wa Tiba Asili na Tiba za kisasa katika kuhimarisha
huduma ya Afya Afrika’
Kumekuwa na maoni mbalimbali kutoka kwa baadhi ya
wadau wa Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala juu ya maonyesho hayo huku wengi wao
wakisema kuwa yatatoa nafasi kwa wadau wa Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala
kujitangaza kwa mapana zaidi.
Lakini pia kuna waliokwenda mbali zaidi na kusema
kuwa kuna uwezekano mkubwa wa maonyesho hayo kuibua dawa nyingine za Tiba Asili
kwa kujua ziko kwa nani, ni nani alifanya utafiti wa dawa hizo.
“Haya ni maonyesho ambayo yanatoa fursa pekee kwa
watabibu na wadau wengine wa Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala kubadilishana mawazo
kwa kile walicho nacho.
“Hii ina maana ya kwamba mshiriki kutoka Tanzania
atajifunza jambo kutoka kwa mshiriki kutoka Uganga, Kenya na nchi nyingine
zitakazoshiriki. Hii ndiyo faida mojawapo kwa wale watakaopata nafasi ya
kushiriki katika maonyesho hayo,” alisema Simba A. Simba, ambaye ni Mwenyekiti
wa Chama cha Watabibu wa Dawa Asili Tanzania (ATME).
Hyasinta Ntuyeko ni muuzaji wa bidhaa za asili jijini
Dar es Salaam ambaye anasema kuwa alipopata taarifa juu ya maonyesho hayo
alivutiwa, akachukua fomu ya ushiriki akiwa anaamini kwamba ana kitu cha
kujifunza kupitia maonyesho hayo.
“Ni maonyesho
mazuri kwasababu yatashirikisha watu kutoka nchi mbalimbali. Nafikiria kuwa hii
ndiyo fursa pekee ambayo tunaweza kuitumia ikatujenga zaidi sisi wadau wa
bidhaa za Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala,” alisema Hyasinta ambaye pia ni
mtengenezaji na muuzaji wa taulo tiba za akina mama.
Innocent Oroki ni mmoja wa watengenezaji na
wasambazaji wa dawa Asili kutoka Machame Moshi. Anasema kuwa anachofanya kwa
sasa ni maandalizi ya dawa mbalimbali ambazo anataka watu wazione kwa wingi
wakati wa maonyesho hayo.
“Kwa kuwa kupitia maonyesho haya tutapata fursa ya
kuelimishana, nafikiri kwa upande wetu tumefikiria kuandaa dawa nyingi zaidi
ili wenzetu kutoka nchi nyingine waweze kuziona na kutujua zaidi katika huduma
hii ya Tiba Asili.
“Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala bado inahitaji
kufahamika kwa watanzania walio wengi, Ninaamini maonyesho haya ni fursa muhimu
kwetu kufanya hivyo kwa kuwapa elimu sahihi,” alisema Innocent
Lakini pia hakusita kuwakemea wale wanaotumia kofia
ya tiba asili kufanya vitendo vinavyohatarisha maisha ya binadamu akidai kuwa
hiyo ni moja ya changamoto kubwa ambazo bado wanahitaji kupambana nazo katika
huduma ya Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala.
“Changamoto nyingine kubwa tuliyonayo kwa sasa
katika Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala ni baadhi ya watu wanaojiita watabibu wa Tiba
Asili, kutumia mwavuli huo kufanya vitendo vya kuhatarisha maisha ya watu.
“Hili nalo tunahitaji kulikomesha kwa kuwaelimisha
wananchi ili watambue na kufahamu mahala sahihi pa kupata huduma ya hizo kwa
mujibu wa taratibu zilizowekwa na serikali,” alisema Innocent, ambaye hivi
karibuni alikuwa jijini Dar es Salaam akifuatilia taratibu za kushiriki katika
maonyesho hayo.
Mwenyekiti wa Kamati ya Maandalizi ya maonyesho hayo
Boniventure Mwalongo anasema kuwa wanatarajia washiriki 280 kutoka nje na ndani
ya nchi. Lakini pia anafafanua kuwa wamekuwa katika maongezi na taasisi na
kampuni mbalimbali ambazo zimeonyesha kutaka kudhamini maonyesho hayo.
“Tuna maongezi na taasisi pamoja kampuni mbalimbali.
Tayari baadhi zimekubali kutudhamini. Taarifa rasmi tutaitoa pale maongezi
yatakapokuwa yamekamilika,” anasena Mwalongo.
Amewataka wadau wa Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala kujitokeza
kwa wingi akielezea kuwa baada ya hapo watakuwa na mtandao mzuri wa wadau
mbalimbali wa Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala katika Bara la Afrika.
“Kama maonyesho haya yamebeba jina la Afrika, basi
hata sisi tutahakikisha tunajenga mtandao wa wadau wa Tiba Asili na Tiba Mbadala
na hasa katika suala zima la kuhimarisha soko.
Kwa mujibu wa Mwalongo, gharama za kushiriki
zimegawantika katika makundi tofauti ambapo Watambuzi wa magonjwa,
watengenezaji wa dawa asili, wakunga wa tiba asili, Wenye virutubisho vya tiba
asili na wauzaji wa dawa asili gharama
yao ni 100,000/-. Kampuni za dawa asili na vipodozi asili zitalipa 500,000/-.
Wasambazaji wa dawa za asili na dawa mbadala
watatakiwa kulipa ada ya 1,000,000/-. Wauza vyakula asili watalipia 150,000/- wakati kliniki ya tiba
asili watalipia 1,500,000/- Kliniki ya tiba mbadala gharama yake ni
2,000,000/-. Kampuni za virutubisho kutoka nje ya Jumuiya ya Afrika Mashariki
zitalipia dola za Marekani 1,500.
Viwango vingine ni dola 500 za Marekani kwa Kampuni
za Tiba Asili ndani ya Jumuiya ya Afrika Mshariki. Gharama za ushiriki kwa
Benki, Mifuko ya Hifadhi ya Jamii na Taasisi za Serikali ni 2,000,000/-.
Wajasiliamali wa kazi za uchongaji watalipia 500,000, wakati vyama vya tiba
asili vitalipia 1,000,000.
Aidha Mwalongo alitoa wito kwa makundi mengine
ambayo yangependa kushiriki, kujitokeza mapema ili taratibu ziweze kufuatwa.
“Huenda kuna makundi mengine ambayo labda tumeyasahau, lakini milango bado iko
wazi kwa yeyote ambaye angependa kushiriki maonyesho haya,” alisisitiza
Mwalongo.
Alisema kuwa wana imani baada ya maonyesho hayo
kutakuwa na mtandao mkubwa wa kibiashara katika huduma ya tiba asili na tiba
mbadala kwa nchi za Afrika na hata nje ya Afrika. Aidha alisema kuwa wako
mbioni kuyasajili rasmi maonyesho hayo ili yawe yanafanyika kila Agosti 30 pale
inapoadhimishwa siku ya Tiba Asili ya Mwafrika.
Tuesday, 21 October 2014
On 14:17 by Unknown No comments
Herbal medicine research and global health: an ethical analysis Do you know that Eighty per cent of African populations use some form of traditional herbal medicine?
Abstract
Governments,
international agencies and corporations are increasingly investing in
traditional herbal medicine research. Yet little literature addresses
ethical challenges in this research. In this paper, we apply concepts in
a comprehensive ethical framework for clinical research to
international traditional herbal medicine research. We examine in detail
three key, underappreciated dimensions of the ethical framework in
which particularly difficult questions arise for international herbal
medicine research: social value, scientific validity and favourable
risk–benefit ratio. Significant challenges exist in determining shared
concepts of social value, scientific validity and favourable
risk–benefit ratio across international research collaborations.
However, we argue that collaborative partnership, including democratic
deliberation, offers the context and process by which many of the
ethical challenges in international herbal medicine research can, and
should be, resolved. By “cross-training” investigators, and investing in
safety-monitoring infrastructure, the issues identified by this
comprehensive framework can promote ethically sound international herbal
medicine research that contributes to global health.
Introduction
Traditional
herbal medicines are naturally occurring, plant-derived substances with
minimal or no industrial processing that have been used to treat
illness within local or regional healing practices. Traditional herbal
medicines are getting significant attention in global health debates. In
China, traditional herbal medicine played a prominent role in the
strategy to contain and treat severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).1 Eighty per cent of African populations use some form of traditional herbal medicine,2,3 and the worldwide annual market for these products approaches US$ 60 billion.2
Many hope traditional herbal medicine research will play a critical
role in global health. China, India, Nigeria, the United States of
America (USA) and WHO have all made substantial research investments in
traditional herbal medicines.2 Industry has also invested millions of US dollars looking for promising medicinal herbs and novel chemical compounds.4,5
This is still a relatively modest investment compared to the overall
pharmaceutical industry; however, it raises interesting ethical
questions, some of which are not faced in more conventional drug
development.
As attention and public
funding for international traditional herbal medicine research
collaborations grows, more detailed analysis of ethical issues in this
research is warranted. Scant literature has addressed selected issues
such as informed consent and independent review related to traditional
herbal medicine research.6,7
Here we apply a practical, comprehensive and widely accepted ethical
framework to international traditional herbal medicine research.8
We examine in detail difficult questions related to social value,
scientific validity and favourable risk–benefit ratio. We conclude with
implications for future research in this area, focusing on the
importance of collaborative partnership.
Case
A
government agency from a developed country is conducting an
HIV-treatment trial in Africa. A traditional herbal medicine, Africa
Flower, has been used for decades to treat wasting symptoms associated
with HIV. Local traditional medicine healers believe Africa Flower is an
effective antiviral. It is already widely used for immune boosting in
AIDS. In vitro pharmacokinetic studies suggest potential interference
with vaccines, and animal models show liver toxicity at very high doses.
There are no systemic side-effects reported for humans in the
literature. A few case series have shown mixed results. Local leaders
are requesting the government agency conduct a large, randomized
controlled trial (RCT) of Africa Flower to test its efficacy as a novel
adjunctive therapy to slow progression to AIDS.
Ethical framework
Cases
like these present challenging questions related to the role of
traditional herbal medicines in public health. In general, international
research on traditional herbal medicines should be subject to the same
ethical requirements as all research related to human subjects.9 An ethical framework previously outlined by Emanuel et al. and revised for international research8
offers a useful starting point for thinking about the ethics of
international traditional herbal medicine research. This framework
includes eight ethical requirements for clinical research (Table 1).8
These ethical requirements are universal and comprehensive but must be
adapted to the particular social context in which the research is
implemented.8
Of these, fair subject selection, independent review, informed consent,
and respect for enrolled subjects have been discussed previously in the
literature on the ethics of global health research and raise few issues
unique to international traditional herbal medicine research.8
However, social value, scientific validity, and favourable risk–benefit
ratio raise specific challenges in international herbal medicine
research that have not been adequately discussed.
Social value
All
research should hold the potential to achieve social value. Different
entities may view the social value of traditional medicine research
differently. Public-health officials are often eager to define the
safety and effectiveness of herbal medicines for conditions such as
malaria.3 Conversely, harm can arise with the unscrupulous use of herbs such as Africa potato (various Hypoxis species).7
While some claim that such medicines have “stood the test of time”,
they nonetheless pose serious challenges to investigators and regulators
from developed countries, in which standards of proof are closely
linked to proven efficacy in RCTs. Accordingly, there has been a serious
investment in herbal medicine research by public-health bodies in many
countries. China recently launched a safety research programme focusing
on herbal medicine injections from traditional Chinese medicine.10 South Africa recently included the need for investigating traditional medicines within its national drug policy.11
In
the USA, the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
at the National Institutes of Health spent approximately US$ 33 million
on herbal medicines in fiscal year 2005; in 2004 the National Cancer
Institute committed nearly US$ 89 million to studying a range of
traditional therapies.12
While this scale of investment pales in comparison to the total
research and development expenses of the pharmaceutical industry, it
nevertheless reflects genuine public, industry and governmental interest
in this area.
While public-health entities may be
concerned with defining the risks and benefits of herbal medicines
already in use, entrepreneurs and corporations hope herbal medicines may
yield immediate returns from herbal medicine sales, or yield clues to
promising chemical compounds for future pharmaceutical development. They
test individual herbs, or their components, analysed in
state-of-the-art high-throughput screening systems, hoping to isolate
therapeutic phytochemicals or biologically active functional components.
In 2006, Novartis reported that it would invest over US$ 100 million to
investigate traditional medicine in Shanghai alone.4,5
Nongovernmental
organizations may be primarily interested in preserving indigenous
medical knowledge. One such organization, the Association for the
Promotion of Traditional Medicine (PROMETRA), based in Dakar, Senegal,
is “dedicated to preserving and restoring African traditional medicine
and indigenous science”.13
Governments in developing countries may want to use traditional herbal
medicine research to expand the influence of their culture’s indigenous
herbal practices in the global health-care market. For instance,
Nigeria’s president recently established a national committee on
traditional medicine with the expressed desire to boost Nigeria’s market
share of traditional medicine.14 In developed countries, the “need” for this research may be to protect the public.
The
perceived need for the research may justifiably differ across
countries, but without some basic agreement on the primary source of
social value for the research it may be difficult to judge its ultimate
impact. In the Africa Flower case above, before agreements to study a
herbal medicine are decided, partners must fully discuss potential
differences about the perceived “need” for the research through public
forums or structured debates. Based on these frank discussions, partners
can assess whether the social values of partner countries are
sufficiently compatible to warrant a research partnership.
Scientific validity
Part
of ensuring the social value of research includes devising and
implementing sound science. Although international collaborative
research on herbal medicine is no exception, discussing scientific
validity as an ethical requirement raises some specific challenges,
including the meaning of scientific validity, establishing inclusion and
exclusion criteria, using appropriate outcome measures, and determining
appropriate study designs.
Balancing internal and external validity
Building
a valid basis for knowledge in herbal medicine will require balancing
two aspects of scientific validity: internal and external validity.15
Internal validity means the research must reliably test hypothesized
relationships between an intervention and an outcome under controlled
conditions. Internally valid research will typically try to answer a
focused research question that is salient within the vocabulary and
methods of the scientific community at the time the research is
conducted. External validity refers to the applicability of the research
results to a target population outside the experimental conditions of
the research study. External validity must always be weighed against the
need for rigorous internally valid research.
This tension between internal and external validity can be illustrated by a recent herbal medicine trial of Echinacea angustifolia extract for prevention of parainfluenza virus infection.16
The study was conducted under rigorous experimental conditions, but
many herbalists pointed out that study conditions did not sufficiently
reflect how these medicines are actually used. Null treatment trial
results like these prompt questions about the external validity (i.e.
value and meaning) of the research. Was the herbal medicine truly
ineffective, or did the experiment not reflect the herb’s use in
“real-world” practice? In herbal medicine there are often huge
variations in the way in which the medicines are used in herbalist
practice, including herb source, preparation, dose and indication.
Because traditional herbal medicine practitioners may be unregulated and
their products lacking in standardization, it may be difficult to
generalize the results from a formal, structured and highly monitored
trial to what will happen in the widespread dissemination of the herbal
medicine. Nevertheless, herbal medicine research must endeavour to
achieve a balance between internal and external validity.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
To
ensure that research results are externally valid, the inclusion and
exclusion criteria for research participation should fit with existing
diagnostic categories in the target population specified by the research
question. However, conceptualizations of health and illness can vary
across medical systems and populations, making agreement on valid
inclusion and exclusion criteria for international herbal medicine
research collaborations more difficult to achieve.
During
the SARS epidemic, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) practitioners
involved in the care of SARS patients characterized patients based on
nosological categories derived from TCM including “deficiency of chi and
yin” as well as “stagnation of pathogenic phlegm”.17
Designing clinical trials using these kinds of TCM categories as
inclusion criteria would require significant additional effort and
biomedical flexibility to implement. If one wanted to test whether TCM
works for populations in south-east Asia affected by a SARS-like
illness, adapting the science to include traditional diagnostic
categories may be critical for its ultimate external validity.
If
American researchers want to test a herb’s effects on heart failure,
they might use the New York Heart Association classification as part of
the inclusion/exclusion criteria. However, this classification makes
little sense from a TCM perspective, in which heart failure may be
viewed primarily as either a heart yang chi deficiency or a kidney yang deficiency.18
TCM practitioners may prefer to categorize patients based on pulses,
tongue examination, and other elements of traditional diagnosis.
Investigators have simultaneously used both biomedical entry criteria
and stratified for TCM diagnosis.19 Such an approach is scientifically ideal because of its ability to maximize the external validity of results.
Valid outcome measures
International
herbal medicine research must use outcome measures that accurately
capture the effects conferred by herbal medicines. However, constructs
such as “physical functioning” or “psychological well-being” measured by
the SF-36 quality of life instrument make little sense within the
terminology and ideas of TCM.20
Therefore to accurately measure a TCM herb’s effects on quality of
life, some investigators have constructed and validated analoguous
measures that more faithfully detect the effects of TCM interventions
that make sense within that healing tradition.20,21
Ideally, when new measures are introduced, they should overlap with
existing outcome measures, so that the research can adequately
contribute to the existing body of knowledge.
Determining research design
While
it is generally agreed that all human subjects research must maintain
valid study designs, questions arise about the characteristics of a
valid research design. Two extreme positions are often defended. At one
extreme, some researchers trained in biomedical methods of clinical
investigation argue that the only valid source of knowledge
regarding clinical efficacy must come from one type of research design,
the randomized double blind, placebo-controlled trial. They argue that
any deviations from this gold standard of scientific validity amount to
worthless science.
At the other extreme, critics of
biomedical research conducted on traditional medicines charge that
attempts to evaluate traditional therapies with biomedical methodologies
may fail to generate true knowledge, since that knowledge itself
depends on a scientific vocabulary that only makes sense from within the
concepts of biomedicine.22–24 They worry that “standard notions of ... experimental design criteria represent an imperialistic ‘western’ mode of thinking”.22,24
Research
on herbal medicines should typically employ experimental research
designs such as the RCT. Even if research tools (including the RCT) are
imperfect,25 they are thus far the best methods we have for furthering our knowledge.9,15
Consider how RCT designs could be implemented in TCM, in which
treatments are individualized to patients, often incorporating several,
or even dozens, of herbs in a customized preparation. Despite these
complexities, investigators have successfully adapted double-blind RCT
designs to complex individually tailored Chinese herbs. Bensoussan et
al. conducted a three-arm trial in which they tested the comparative
clinical efficacy of standard complex herbal medicines, customized
therapy and placebo.26
Standard and customized therapy were comparably beneficial as compared
to placebo. In other instances, cluster RCTs can allow for practitioner
variability, while still rigorously testing the efficacy of a
therapeutic approach. In cross-cultural settings, researchers cannot
merely adopt alternative designs in an ad hoc manner, but must reflect
on and refine their research question, and find a design that best
answers the research question within the given cultural context.
In
recent years, growing attention has been paid to a group of additional
important ethical issues surrounding publication bias, financial
conflicts of interest, and clinical trial registries. In the arena of
traditional herbal medicine, these same issues apply, and when
cross-cultural differences exist in the definitions of valid science, as
is the case in traditional herbal medicine research, these questions
compound. For instance, until recently, there was a tendency to see only
positive studies published in China. It is, therefore, critically
important to the long-term scientific credibility of international
traditional herbal medicine research that, at the outset, partners agree
about the standards of scientific conduct, the disclosure of financial
relationships, registration of clinical trials, and adequate reporting
of trial results.
Favourable risk–benefit ratio
In
international herbal medicine research, several practical challenges
arise in making accurate risk–benefit determinations. Typically, in
American pharmaceutical development, a step-wise process of drug testing
occurs – a compound is isolated, tested in tissue cultures and animals,
and then investigated in phase 1, 2 and 3 clinical trials. However,
herbal medicines are already in widespread use, are often used in
combination, and are drawn from plant sources with their own variability
in species, growing conditions and biologically active constituents.
They often come into use by a process of trial and error, or over
centuries. Accordingly, in clinical herbal medicine research there is
rarely a strong preclinical basis for dosing, and there are significant
looming questions about product purity, quality, chemical stability and
active constituents at the time herbal medicine trials are proposed.27,28
Initiating
large-scale research trials in such circumstances raises questions
about whether the risks and benefits of research participation can be
accurately ascertained. Those reviewing protocols should factor in the
uncertainty associated with product variability in determining whether a
herbal medicine trial has a favourable risk–benefit ratio. However,
protocol reviewers (i.e. institutional review boards) should not presume
that because they are personally unfamiliar with a herbal preparation
that there is no credible or valuable background evidence regarding
safety and potential efficacy. While researchers should provide such
information in protocol materials, reviewers must remain aware of the
role their own lack of familiarity may play in their ultimate judgements
of risks and benefits of the research.
Researchers
increasingly agree that it is important to establish a rational basis
for dosing and standardization of biologically active compounds before
conducting large-scale treatment trials.29,30
These efforts can improve investigators’ ability to assess the risks
and benefits of participation in large-scale herbal medicine trials.
Likewise, more rigorous monitoring of adverse events and standardized
reporting of research results for both safety and efficacy data will
improve long-term efforts to enhance risk–benefit ratio determination
for trial participation.31
Cultural
factors also may influence judgements of the risks and benefits in
herbal medicine research. For instance, a cultural familiarity with many
traditional Chinese herbal medicines in China may promote a familiarity
bias, accepting a widespread cultural assumption of safety, based on
the historical use of herbal medicines.32 There may also be a cultural difference in emphasis placed on standardized adverse events reporting in China.33
These cultural differences make achieving agreed-upon standards of
favourable risk–benefit ratio more difficult. In order for international
collaborative herbal medicine research to achieve its objectives, it
will be important to establish standards of evidence for demonstration
of safety before conducting large-scale clinical trials evaluating the
efficacy of herbal medicines.
Improving science through collaborative partnership
How
can international collaborative herbal medicine trials achieve the
ethical requirements outlined above? Collaborative partnership, the
first requirement for international research ethics, provides both the
rationale and the context for achieving appropriate application of the
other ethical requirements. Partners in these collaborations must share
vocabulary for all the requirements, especially for social value,
scientific validity, and favourable risk–benefit ratio. How can
agreed-upon language be achieved? As illustrated here, these challenges
are significant. In the case presented earlier, investigators should
have reservations about implementing a large-scale clinical trial for
Africa Flower. Nevertheless, the local interest in this substance may be
valid and deserve some additional preliminary investigation.
Collaborative partnership displays a commitment by all parties in
international research agreements to work together for common language
and goals.
To achieve collaborative partnership,
parties can engage in structured methods of democratic deliberation to
devise shared language and concepts for research. These methods have
been used to bring different parties together in a safe and collegial
process of decision-making.34
Over time, collaborations could “cross-train” basic and clinical
investigators to more fully appreciate the concepts and practices of the
traditional herbal medicine traditions, and developing host countries
would need to develop the basic literacy, knowledge and skills among
traditional medicine practitioners so that they see the value of
rigorous clinical research.2
With a sustained investment like this, it will become increasingly
possible to conduct sound international scientific investigation on
traditional herbal medicine. Furthermore, sustainable collaborative
research partnerships would benefit from robust and independent
adverse-event reporting systems for herbal medicines so that the
risk–benefit ratio for herbal medicine research can be more clearly
defined.
Ethical challenges in
international traditional herbal medicine call for a comprehensive
framework. Addressing these challenges requires collaborative
partnership that implements sound research designs. So envisioned,
international herbal medicine research can contribute to global health. ■
Acknowledgements
Franklin G Miller and Jack Killen generously read and offered helpful suggestions on earlier versions of this paper.
Footnotes
Funding:
TJK is a consultant for Kan Herbal Company, Scotts Valley, CA, USA.
Partial funding for TJK was provided by the National Center for
Complementary and Alternative Medicine at the National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Competing interests: None declared.
References
1. SARS. clinical trials on treatment using a combination of traditional chinese medicine and western medicine Geneva: WHO; 2003. pp. 53-61.
2. WHO traditional medicine strategy 2002–2005 Geneva: WHO; 2002.
3. Willcox ML, Bodeker G. Traditional herbal medicines for malaria. BMJ. 2004;329:1156–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7475.1156. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Zamiska N. On the trail of ancient cures. Wall Street Journal November 15, 2006: B1, B12.
5. Novartis eyes traditional Chinese medicine United Press International. Available from: http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20061106-022125-5205r [accessed on 1 August 2007].
6. Zaslawski
C. The ethics of complementary and alternative medicine research: a
case study of Traditional Chinese Medicine at the University of
Technology, Sydney. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2005;24:52–60. [PubMed]
7. Nyika A. Ethical and regulatory issues surrounding African traditional medicine in the context of HIV/AIDS. Developing World Bioeth 2006. Available from: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/dewb/0/0 [accessed on 1 November 2006].
8. Emanuel
EJ, Wendler D, Killen J, Grady C. What makes clinical research in
developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:930–7. doi: 10.1086/381709. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
9. Miller FG, Emanuel EJ, Rosenstein DL, Straus SE. Ethical issues concerning research in complementary and alternative medicine. JAMA. 2004;291:599–604. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.5.599. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
10. Chong W. China launches traditional medicine safety research Science and Development Network; 2006. Available from: http://www.scidev.net/en/news/china-launches-traditional-medicine-safety-researc.html [accessed on 1 November 2006].
11. Pefile S. South African legislation on traditional medicine Science and Development Network; 2005. Available from: http://www.scidev.net/en/policy-briefs/south-african-legislation-on-traditional-medicine.html [accessed on 11 December 2006].
12. White J. Public address: Overview
of NCI’s TCM-related research presented at Traditional Chinese Medicine
and Cancer Research: Fostering Collaboration; Advancing the Science,
April10,2006 Office of Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine (OCCAM).
13. Serbulea M. Old meets new in West Africa’s medicine mix Science and Development Network; 2005. Available from: http://www.scidev.net/en/features/old-meets-new-in-west-africas-medicine-mix.html [accessed on 31 January 2007].
14. Adelaja A. Nigeria boosts research into traditional medicine Science and Development Network; 2006. Available from: http://www.scidev.net/en/news/nigeria-boosts-research-into-traditional-medicine.html [accessed on 15 February 2007].
15. Linde
K, Jonas WB. Evaluating complementary and alternative medicine: the
balance of rigor and relevance. In: Jonas WB, Levin JS, eds. Essentials of complementary and alternative medicine Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999 pp. 57-71.
16. Turner
RB, Bauer R, Woelkart K, Hulsey TC, Gangemi JD. An evaluation of
Echinacea angustifolia in experimental rhinovirus infections. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:341–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044441. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
17. Boli
Z, Shuren L, Junping Z, Hongwu W. Manifestation of symptoms in patients
with SARS and analysis of the curative effect of treatment with
integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western medicine. In: SARS: clinical trials on treatment using a combination of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western medicine Geneva: WHO; 2003. pp. 53-61.
18. Kaptchuk TJ. The web that has no weaver: understanding Chinese medicine New York: Contemporary Books; 2000.
19. Macklin
EA, Wayne PM, Kalish LA, Valaskatgis P, Thompson J, Pian-Smith MC, et
al. Stop hypertension with the acupuncture research program (SHARP):
results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Hypertension. 2006;48:838–45. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000241090.28070.4c. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
20. Zhao
L, Chan K. Building a bridge for integrating Chinese medicine into
conventional healthcare: observations drawn from the development of the
Chinese Quality of Life Instrument. Am J Chin Med. 2005;33:897–902. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X05003533. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
21. Schnyer
RN, Conboy LA, Jacobson E, McKnight P, Goddard T, Moscatelli F, et al.
Development of a Chinese medicine assessment measure: an
interdisciplinary approach using the Delphi method. J Altern Complement Med. 2005;11:1005–13. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.1005. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
22. Schaffner KF. Assessments of efficacy in biomedicine: the turn toward methodological pluralism. In: Callahan D, ed. The role of complementary and alternative medicine: accommodating pluralism Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2002. p. 7.
23. Fabrega H. Medical validity in eastern and western traditions. Perspect Biol Med. 2002;45:395–415. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2002.0044. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
24. Scheid V. Chinese medicine in contemporary China: plurality and synthesis Durham: Duke University Press; 2002 p. 26.
25. Kaptchuk TJ. The double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial: gold standard or golden calf? J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:541–9. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00347-4. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
26. Bensoussan
A, Talley NJ, Hing M, Menzies R, Guo A, Ngu M. Treatment of irritable
bowel syndrome with Chinese herbal medicine: a randomized controlled
trial. JAMA. 1998;280:1585–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.18.1585. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
27. Ernst E. Adulteration of Chinese herbal medicines with synthetic drugs: a systematic review. J Intern Med. 2002;252:107–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2002.00999.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
28. Ernst E. Heavy metals in traditional Chinese medicines: a systematic review. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;70:497–504. [PubMed]
29. Guidance on designing clinical trials of CAM therapies: determining dose ranges National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine; 2003. Available from: www.nccam.nih.gov/research/policies/guideonct.htm [accessed on 1 November 2006].
30. Yuan R, Lin Y. Traditional Chinese medicine: an approach to scientific proof and clinical validation. Pharmacol Ther. 2000;86:191–8. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(00)00039-5. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
31. Gagnier
JJ, Boon H, Rochon P, Moher D, Barnes J, Bombardier for the CONSORT
Group. Reporting randomized controlled trials of herbal interventions:
an elaborated CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:364–7. [PubMed]
32. Lam TP. Strengths and weaknesses of traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine in the eyes of some Hong Kong Chinese. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001;55:762–5. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.10.762. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
33. Leung AY. Traditional toxicity documentation of Chinese materia medica – an overview. Toxicol Pathol. 2006;34:319–26. doi: 10.1080/01926230600773958. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
34. Gastil J, Levine P, editors. The deliberative democracy handbook: strategies for effective civic engagement in the 21st century San Francisco, CA: Wiley; 2005.
Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Mkurugenzi wa Kampuni ya Boresa na Mwenyekiti wa Jukwaa la Tiba Asili Tanzania Tabibu Boniventura Mwalongo akitoa salam za pongezi kumpongeza Mhe. DKT John Pombe Joseph Magufuli kwa Kuchaguliwa Kuwa Raisi wa awamu ya tano wa Jamhuri ya Muungano wa Tanzania mnamo tarehe 5 Novemba 2015 katika sherehe za kuapishwa kwa Rais Dkt. John Pombe Joseph Magufuli
kipanya
Popular Posts
-
TUJIKUMBUSHE YALE MAAJABU SABA YA DUNIA YA MWAKA 2007 Na Alberto sanga endelea...
-
habari zilizotufikia,Samaki huyu adimu kabisa duniani kumtia machoni ameonekana amefariki ama amekufa pembeni mwa ufukwe wa baha...
-
WAGANGA na wakunga wa tiba asili ni miongoni mwa watoa huduma za afya mbadala nchini ambapo wanaongozwa na sheria, mila, desturi na tarati...
-
WATAALAMU WA TIBA ASILI WAKUTANA CHINI YA JUKWAA MOJA; WAONYESHA UMAHIRI KATIKA TIBA ASILI NA MBADALA Mratibu wa Jukwaa la Tiba Asil...
-
FAHAMU KUHUSU TIBA A SILIA YA KUUNGANISHA MIFUPA Watu wengi wanao pata ajali za barabarani na kuvunjika viungo ...
-
WASHIRIKI katika Maonyesho ya Biashara ya Kimataifa ya Tiba Asili ya Mwafrika yatakayofanyika Viwanja vya Mnazi Mmoja jijini Dar es Sal...
-
Archeological and modern genetic evidence suggest that human populations have migrated into the Indian subcontine...
-
AGOSTI 31 mwaka huu kulikuwa na Maadhimisho ya Siku ya Tiba Asili ya Mwafrika yaliyofanyika Zanzibar katika viwanja vya Bustani ya Vi...
-
· Mwenyekiti wa Serikali ya Mtaa · Afisa Maendeleo wa Mtaa · Mwenyekiti wa Kamati ya Afya na Mazingira · ...